|
|
|
AP BIOLOGY:
Chapter Twenty-One Outline
INTRODUCTION
Evolution Well Known, But Poorly Understood by Public
Many feel evolution challenges their religious beliefs fig 21.1
Trends to teach religious dogma as scientific creationism
Evolutionary Change in Natural Populations Is Adaptive
Microevolution: changes in gene frequency within populations of species
Macroevolution: replacement of one species by another
THE EVIDENCE THAT NATURAL SELECTION EXPLAINS MICROEVOLUTION
Some Genetic Variation Maintained by Natural Selection tbl 21.1
Sickle-Cell Anemia
Causes red blood cells to assume irregular, elongated shapes
Disease affects shape of hemoglobin molecule
Hydrophobic valine substituted for polar glutamic acid
Creates "sticky" patch on surface of hemoglobin
Oxygen shields patch, no unusual interactions
Without oxygen "sticky" patches bind to other patches
Molecules form long, fibrous clumps that deform blood cell
Sickle-cell trait
Heterozygous, Ss individuals
Produce few sickle-shaped cells
Frequency of recessive allele in various populations
African-Americans = 0.045
White Americans = 0.001
Central Africans = 0.12
1 per 5 are heterozygous
1 per 100 heterozygous recessive and die before reproducing
Recessive allele maintained at unusually high levels
Heterozygotes less susceptible to malaria
Heterozygous women more fertile than homozygotes
Environment acts to maintain allele frequency
Selective force in Africa is presence of malaria
Maintenance of allele has adaptive value in Africa fig 21.2
No such selective force in US black population
Selection acts to eliminate allele in US
Peppered Moths and Industrial Melanism fig 21.3
European moth that rests on trees during daytime
Prior to 1850 most had light-colored wings
After 1850 most had dark-colored wings
Possess dominant allele
Allele rare in populations until then
Observed dark tree trunks in industrial areas
Dark moths less conspicuous on their surfaces
Air pollution killed light-colored lichens
Kettlewell hypothesis: birds ate moths on trees
More dark moths survived in polluted areas
More light moths survived in unpolluted areas
Industrial melanism
Evolutionary process affecting light-colored organisms
Populations become dark-colored by natural selection
Trends reversing due to pollution controls
Lead Tolerance
Bent grasses grow on lead mine refuse
Soils contain toxic chemicals
Few plants survive conditions
Comparison of plants in pasture and mine refuse areas
Mine plants in pasture soil survived but grew slowly
Mine plants in mine soil grew well
Most pasture plants in mine soil grew poorly if at all
Few exceptions that grew well
Were of same ancestral stock as mine plants
Genetic predisposition to lead tolerance
Population change is rapid when environment demands it
An Overview of Adaptation
Documented cases of adaptation exist as indicated above
Environment dictates direction and extent of change
THE EVIDENCE FOR MACROEVOLUTION
Support for Darwin`s Evolutionary Theory
Summarization of Darwin`s evidence for macroevolution tbl 1-1
Adaptation provides strong evidence for microevolution tbl 21.2
The Fossil Record
More evidence available than in Darwin`s time
Formation of fossils
Organisms buried in sediment
Calcium in bone and hard tissue is mineralized
Sediment converted to rock
Date of rocks reflects age of fossils
Dating in Darwin`s day solely by relative position
Recent dating uses more accurate techniques
Measure rate of radioisotope decay
Rate constant over time, not affected by temperature or pressure
Fossils arrayed from oldest to youngest
Provide evidence of progressive evolutionary change
Examples
Hoofed mammals fig 21.4
Horse evolution fig 1.15
Oyster shell shape fig 21.5
The Molecular Record
Progressive evolutionary change implies a change within DNA
Result from accumulation of genetic changes
Distant relatives have greater number of differences
Comparison of DNA sequences between organisms
Greater time since divergence associated with more nucleotide changes
Example: cytochrome c fig 21.6
Example: hemoglobin fig 21.7
Phylogenetic tree
Pattern of genetic descent
Determined by comparing nucleotide sequences
Often similar to relationships predicted by anatomy
Homology
Structures derived from common form, but functions are variable
Example: forelimbs of mammals fig 1.14
Development
Evolutionary history reflected in development of embryo
Embryo exhibits characteristics of its ancestors` embryos
Example: human development
Possess fish-like gill slits early in development
Exhibit tail, its vestige becomes coccyx
Possess fine fur during fifth month
Examples
Vertebrate embryo comparisons fig 21.8
Compare larval form of slug and giant squid
Vestigial Structures
Structures with no apparent function resembling those of presumed ancestors
Examples
Human ear muscles
Whale pelvic bone fig 21.9
Four-footed "missing link" whales fig 21.10
Human vermiform appendix
Indicate presumed common ancestry of related organisms
Convergent Evolution
Different areas may possess very distantly related communities with similar appearance
Unlikely that similarities result from coincidence
Example: forms of Australian marsupials fig 21.11
Similarities in groups of species peculiar to one habitat
Examples: albinism and blindness in cave-dwelling organisms
Patterns of Distribution
Organisms on islands most closely resemble forms on nearest continent
Forms not identical, but diverged over time
Example: Galapagos finches fig 1.10
THE TEMPO AND MODE OF EVOLUTION
Evolution of Different Groups Proceed at Different Rates
Most mammal species evolved fairly recently, genera are older
Lungfish and other animals exhibit little change
Groups of Organisms Have Fast and Slow Periods of Change
Evidence in fossil record
Punctuated equilibria: evolution proceeds in spurts fig 21.12
Occurs when populations are small
Different from parent population by founder effect
Rapid adaptation to novel ecological circumstances
Stasis: lack of evolutionary change
Large populations
Diverse and conflicting selective pressures
Gaps may also be due to incomplete fossil record
Contrasted with gradualism: gradual evolutionary change
SCIENTIFIC CREATIONISM
Acceptance of Evolution
Universally supported by biologists to explain diversity
Supported by observations and experiments
Theory as readily accepted as laws of gravity
Scientific Creationism Attempts to Explain Diversity
Literal interpretation of the Bible
Religious, non-scientific perspective
Earth much younger than scientists believe
All organisms created as they exist today
Arguments to present as theory comparable to evolution
Acceptance of premise that it is truly scientific
Lacks empirical scientific evidence
Does not infer principles from observation
Assumptions do not lead to testable hypotheses
Denies scientific facts assembled over centuries
Implies deceptive creator
Evolution provides scientific explanation
Controversy about how evolution operates, not that it operates
|